From: poza@codeaurora.org
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bhelgaas@google.com, rgummal@xilinx.com,
linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI/AER: Enable SERR# forwarding in non ACPI flow
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:40:02 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fce5d2e4e32b424f41f79782cf447304@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180905201047.GQ107892@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
On 2018-09-06 01:40, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 08:41:27PM +0530, poza@codeaurora.org wrote:
>> On 2018-08-09 20:27, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
>> > As per Figure 6-3 in PCIe r4.0, sec 6.2.6, ERR_ messages
>> > will be forwarded from the secondary interface to the primary interface,
>> > if the SERR# Enable bit in the Bridge Control register is set.
>> > Currently PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_SERR is being enabled only in
>> > ACPI flow.
>> > This patch enables PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_SERR for Type-1 PCI device.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
>> > index a2e8838..4fb0d24 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
>> > @@ -343,6 +343,20 @@ int pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting(struct pci_dev
>> > *dev)
>> > if (!dev->aer_cap)
>> > return -EIO;
>> >
>> > + if (dev->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE) {
>> > + u16 control;
>> > +
>> > + /*
>> > + * A Type-1 PCI bridge will not forward ERR_ messages coming
>> > + * from an endpoint if SERR# forwarding is not enabled.
>> > + */
>> > + pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, &control);
>> > + if (!(control & PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_SERR)) {
>> > + control |= PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_SERR;
>> > + pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, control);
>> > + }
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > return pcie_capability_set_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL,
>> > PCI_EXP_AER_FLAGS);
>> > }
>> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting);
>> > @@ -352,6 +366,15 @@ int pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting(struct pci_dev
>> > *dev)
>> > if (pcie_aer_get_firmware_first(dev))
>> > return -EIO;
>> >
>> > + if (dev->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE) {
>> > + u16 control;
>> > +
>> > + /* Clear SERR Forwarding */
>> > + pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, &control);
>> > + control &= ~PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_SERR;
>> > + pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, control);
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > return pcie_capability_clear_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL,
>> > PCI_EXP_AER_FLAGS);
>> > }
>>
>>
>> Hi Bjorn,
>>
>> I made some comments on patchv1., same I am putting it across here.
>>
>> what about hot-plug case ?
>> should not aer_init() call pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() for all
>> the downstream pci_dev ?
>> and remove all the calls from drivers..
>> aer_init will be called for each device (pci_dev) while pciehp does
>> re-enumeration.
>> so probable we might want to call pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting()
>> but that dictates the design where AER framework is taking decision to
>> enable error reporting on behalf of drivers as well.
>> but thats fine I think, if drivers do not want to participate then
>> they have
>> to call pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting explicitly.
>> does this make sense ?
>
> I just replied to the original patch; sorry, I forgot to add you to
> the cc list. Bharat, when people respond to your v<N> patch, can you
> please add them (and anybody else *they* added) to the cc list when
> you post your v<N+1> patch?
>
> If we set PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_SERR in the pci_configure_device() path,
> would that address your comments?
yes, that should do.
>
> There's still a separate question of where and how we should configure
> the error bits in PCI_EXP_DEVCTL (currently done in
> pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting()).
>
> Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-10 6:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-09 14:57 [PATCH v2] PCI/AER: Enable SERR# forwarding in non ACPI flow Bharat Kumar Gogada
2018-08-09 15:11 ` poza
2018-08-24 12:13 ` Bharat Kumar Gogada
2018-08-24 12:13 ` Bharat Kumar Gogada
2018-09-05 20:10 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-10 6:10 ` poza [this message]
2018-09-05 20:04 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fce5d2e4e32b424f41f79782cf447304@codeaurora.org \
--to=poza@codeaurora.org \
--cc=bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rgummal@xilinx.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.