All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Cc: "kvmarm@lists.linux.dev" <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	yuzenghui <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 08/13] KVM: arm64: Add support for KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 18:00:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fd9aee7022ea47e29cbff3120764c2c6@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86pm8iv8tj.wl-maz@kernel.org>

Hi Marc,
Sorry for jumping late. I am updating the Qemu code for the VCPU hotplug
to reflect Oliver's SMCCC filtering changes and I have few doubts.

Please scroll below.

> From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2023 12:59 PM
> To: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
> Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev; kvm@vger.kernel.org; Paolo Bonzini
> <pbonzini@redhat.com>; James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>; Suzuki K Poulose
> <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>; yuzenghui <yuzenghui@huawei.com>; Sean
> Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>; Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/13] KVM: arm64: Add support for
> KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL
> 
> On Wed, 05 Apr 2023 08:35:05 +0100,
> Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 16:40:45 +0100,
> > Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> wrote:
> > >
> > > In anticipation of user hypercall filters, add the necessary plumbing to
> > > get SMCCC calls out to userspace. Even though the exit structure has
> > > space for KVM to pass register arguments, let's just avoid it altogether
> > > and let userspace poke at the registers via KVM_GET_ONE_REG.
> > >
> > > This deliberately stretches the definition of a 'hypercall' to cover
> > > SMCs from EL1 in addition to the HVCs we know and love. KVM doesn't
> > > support EL1 calls into secure services, but now we can paint that as a
> > > userspace problem and be done with it.
> > >
> > > Finally, we need a flag to let userspace know what conduit instruction
> > > was used (i.e. SMC vs. HVC).
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
> > > ---
> > >  Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst    | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> > >  arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h |  4 ++++
> > >  arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c      |  4 +++-
> > >  arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c       | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> > >  4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst  b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> > > index 9b01e3d0e757..9497792c4ee5 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> > > +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> > > @@ -6221,11 +6221,25 @@ to the byte array.
> > >  			__u64 flags;
> > >  		} hypercall;
> > >
> > > -Unused.  This was once used for 'hypercall to userspace'.  To  implement
> > > -such functionality, use KVM_EXIT_IO (x86) or KVM_EXIT_MMIO (all except s390).
> > > +
> > > +It is strongly recommended that userspace use ``KVM_EXIT_IO`` (x86) or
> > > +``KVM_EXIT_MMIO`` (all except s390) to implement functionality that
> > > +requires a guest to interact with host userpace.
> > >
> > >  .. note:: KVM_EXIT_IO is significantly faster than KVM_EXIT_MMIO.
> > >
> > > +For arm64:
> > > +----------
> > > +
> > > +``nr`` contains the function ID of the guest's SMCCC call. Userspace is
> > > +expected to use the ``KVM_GET_ONE_REG`` ioctl to retrieve the call
> > > +parameters from the vCPU's GPRs.
> > > +
> > > +Definition of ``flags``:
> > > + - ``KVM_HYPERCALL_EXIT_SMC``: Indicates that the guest used the SMC
> > > +   conduit to initiate the SMCCC call. If this bit is 0 then the guest
> > > +   used the HVC conduit for the SMCCC call.
> > > +
> > >  ::
> > >
> > >  		/* KVM_EXIT_TPR_ACCESS */
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> > > index f9672ef1159a..f86446c5a7e3 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> > > @@ -472,12 +472,16 @@ enum {
> > >  enum kvm_smccc_filter_action {
> > >  	KVM_SMCCC_FILTER_HANDLE = 0,
> > >  	KVM_SMCCC_FILTER_DENY,
> > > +	KVM_SMCCC_FILTER_FWD_TO_USER,
> > >
> > >  #ifdef __KERNEL__
> > >  	NR_SMCCC_FILTER_ACTIONS
> > >  #endif
> > >  };
> > >
> > > +/* arm64-specific KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL flags */
> > > +#define KVM_HYPERCALL_EXIT_SMC	(1U << 0)
> > > +
> > >  #endif
> > >
> > >  #endif /* __ARM_KVM_H__ */
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> > > index 68f95dcd41a1..3f43e20c48b6 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> > > @@ -71,7 +71,9 @@ static int handle_smc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > >  	 * Trap exception, not a Secure Monitor Call exception [...]"
> > >  	 *
> > >  	 * We need to advance the PC after the trap, as it would
> > > -	 * otherwise return to the same address...
> > > +	 * otherwise return to the same address. Furthermore, pre-incrementing
> > > +	 * the PC before potentially exiting to userspace maintains the same
> > > +	 * abstraction for both SMCs and HVCs.
> >
> > nit: this comment really needs to find its way in the documentation so
> > that a VMM author can determine the PC of the SMC/HVC. This is
> > specially important for 32bit, which has a 16bit encodings for
> > SMC/HVC.
> >
> > And thinking of it, this outlines a small flaw in this API. If
> > luserspace needs to find out about the address of the HVC/SMC, it
> > needs to know the *size* of the instruction. But we don't propagate
> > the ESR value. I think this still works by construction (userspace can
> > check PSTATE and work out whether we're in ARM or Thumb mode), but
> > this feels fragile.
> >
> > Should we expose the ESR, or at least ESR_EL2.IL as an additional
> > flag?


I think we would need "Immediate value" of the ESR_EL2 register in the
user-space/VMM to be able to construct the syndrome value. I cannot see
where it is being sent? 

Please correct me if I am missing anything here.


> Just to make this a quicker round trip, I hacked the following
> together. If you agree with it, I'll stick it on top and get the ball
> rolling.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	M.
> 
> From 9b830e7a3819c2771074bebe66c1d5f20394e3cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 12:48:58 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Expose SMC/HVC width to userspace
> 
> When returning to userspace to handle a SMCCC call, we consistently
> set PC to point to the instruction immediately after the HVC/SMC.
> 
> However, should userspace need to know the exact address of the
> trapping instruction, it needs to know about the *size* of that
> instruction. For AArch64, this is pretty easy. For AArch32, this
> is a bit more funky, as Thumb has 16bit encodings for both HVC
> and SMC.
> 
> Expose this to userspace with a new flag that directly derives
> from ESR_EL2.IL. Also update the documentation to reflect the PC
> state at the point of exit.
> 
> Finally, this fixes a small buglet where the hypercall.{args,ret}
> fields would not be cleared on exit, and could contain some
> random junk.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst    |  8 ++++++++
>  arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h |  3 ++-
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c       | 16 +++++++++++-----
>  3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> index c8ab2f730945..103f945959ed 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> @@ -6244,6 +6244,14 @@ Definition of ``flags``:
>     conduit to initiate the SMCCC call. If this bit is 0 then the guest
>     used the HVC conduit for the SMCCC call.
> 
> + - ``KVM_HYPERCALL_EXIT_16BIT``: Indicates that the guest used a 16bit
> +   instruction to initiate the SMCCC call. If this bit is 0 then the
> +   guest used a 32bit instruction. An AArch64 guest always has this
> +   bit set to 0.
> +
> +At the point of exit, PC points to the instruction immediately following
> +the trapping instruction.
> +
>  ::
> 
>  		/* KVM_EXIT_TPR_ACCESS */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> index 3dcfa4bfdf83..b1c1edf85480 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -491,7 +491,8 @@ struct kvm_smccc_filter {
>  };
> 
>  /* arm64-specific KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL flags */
> -#define KVM_HYPERCALL_EXIT_SMC	(1U << 0)
> +#define KVM_HYPERCALL_EXIT_SMC		(1U << 0)
> +#define KVM_HYPERCALL_EXIT_16BIT	(1U << 1)
> 
>  #endif
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c
> index 9a35d6d18193..3b6523f25afc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c
> @@ -222,13 +222,19 @@ static void kvm_prepare_hypercall_exit(struct
> kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 func_id)
>  {
>  	u8 ec = ESR_ELx_EC(kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu));
>  	struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run;
> -
> -	run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL;
> -	run->hypercall.nr = func_id;
> -	run->hypercall.flags = 0;
> +	u64 flags = 0;
> 
>  	if (ec == ESR_ELx_EC_SMC32 || ec == ESR_ELx_EC_SMC64)
> -		run->hypercall.flags |= KVM_HYPERCALL_EXIT_SMC;
> +		flags |= KVM_HYPERCALL_EXIT_SMC;
> +
> +	if (!kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu))
> +		flags |= KVM_HYPERCALL_EXIT_16BIT;
> +
> +	run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL;
> +	run->hypercall = (typeof(run->hypercall)) {
> +		.nr	= func_id,


Earlier this was the place holder for the "immediate value"

Best regards
Salil

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-17 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-04 15:40 [PATCH v3 00/13] KVM: arm64: Userspace SMCCC call filtering Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 15:40 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] KVM: x86: Redefine 'longmode' as a flag for KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 15:40 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] KVM: arm64: Add a helper to check if a VM has ran once Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 15:40 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] KVM: arm64: Add vm fd device attribute accessors Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 15:40 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] KVM: arm64: Rename SMC/HVC call handler to reflect reality Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 15:40 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] KVM: arm64: Start handling SMCs from EL1 Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 15:40 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] KVM: arm64: Refactor hvc filtering to support different actions Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 15:40 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] KVM: arm64: Use a maple tree to represent the SMCCC filter Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 15:40 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] KVM: arm64: Add support for KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL Oliver Upton
2023-04-05  7:35   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-04-05 11:59     ` Marc Zyngier
2023-04-05 15:30       ` Oliver Upton
2023-05-17 18:00       ` Salil Mehta [this message]
2023-05-17 18:38         ` Oliver Upton
2023-05-18  8:06           ` Marc Zyngier
2023-05-18  9:08             ` Salil Mehta
2023-05-18  9:42               ` Marc Zyngier
2023-05-18 12:16                 ` Salil Mehta
2023-05-18  8:54           ` Salil Mehta
2023-04-04 15:40 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] KVM: arm64: Introduce support for userspace SMCCC filtering Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 15:40 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] KVM: arm64: Return NOT_SUPPORTED to guest for unknown PSCI version Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 15:40 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] KVM: arm64: Let errors from SMCCC emulation to reach userspace Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 15:40 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] KVM: selftests: Add a helper for SMCCC calls with SMC instruction Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 15:40 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] KVM: selftests: Add test for SMCCC filter Oliver Upton
2023-04-05 18:45 ` [PATCH v3 00/13] KVM: arm64: Userspace SMCCC call filtering Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fd9aee7022ea47e29cbff3120764c2c6@huawei.com \
    --to=salil.mehta@huawei.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.