From: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
To: paulmck@kernel.org
Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
joel@joelfernandes.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu/tree: Force quiescent state on callback overload
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 11:49:38 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fdfa6bce-e566-2b04-6be5-e80492a8ae98@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200622225356.GT9247@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Hi Paul,
On 6/23/2020 4:23 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 09:16:24AM +0530, Neeraj Upadhyay wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> On 6/22/2020 8:43 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 01:30:31AM +0530, Neeraj Upadhyay wrote:
>>>> Hi Paul,
>>>>
>>>> On 6/22/2020 1:20 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 12:07:27AM +0530, Neeraj Upadhyay wrote:
>>>>>> On callback overload, we want to force quiescent state immediately,
>>>>>> for the first and second fqs. Enforce the same, by including
>>>>>> RCU_GP_FLAG_OVLD flag, in fqsstart check.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
>>>>>
>>>>> Good catch!
>>>>>
>>>>> But what did you do to verify that this change does the right thing?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanx, Paul
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I haven't done a runtime verification of this code path; I posted this,
>>>> based on review of this code.
>>>
>>> My concern is that under overload, the FQS scans would happen continuously
>>> rather than accelerating only the first such scan in a given grace period.
>>> This would of course result in a CPU-bound grace-period kthread, which
>>> users might not be all that happy with.
>>>
>>> Or am I missing something subtle that prevents this?
>>
>> Looks like under overload, only the first and second scans are accelerated?
>>
>> gf = 0;
>> if (first_gp_fqs) {
>> first_gp_fqs = false;
>> gf = rcu_state.cbovld ? RCU_GP_FLAG_OVLD : 0;
>> }
>
> Very good, it does sound like you understand this, and it matches my
> analysis and passes light testing, so I queued this one. I did improve
> the commit log, please check below. The added detail is helpful to people
> (including ourselves, by the way) who might need to look at this commit
> some time in the future.
>
Thanks; patch looks good; I will try to put more efforts on commit log
for future patches.
> If you have an x86 system lying around, running rcutorture is quite
> straightforward. Non-x86 systems can also run rcutorture, if nothing
> else by using modprobe and rmmod as described here:
>
> https://paulmck.livejournal.com/57769.html
>
> The scripting described in the latter part of this document has worked
> on ARMv8 and PowerPC, and might still work for all I know.
I will set it up at my end; the livejournal is pretty detailed! Thanks
for sharing this!
Thanks
Neeraj
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> commit 9482524d7dd0aea5d32a6efa2979223eea07c029
> Author: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
> Date: Mon Jun 22 00:07:27 2020 +0530
>
> rcu/tree: Force quiescent state on callback overload
>
> On callback overload, it is necessary to quickly detect idle CPUs,
> and rcu_gp_fqs_check_wake() checks for this condition. Unfortunately,
> the code following the call to this function does not repeat this check,
> which means that in reality no actual quiescent-state forcing, instead
> only a couple of quick and pointless wakeups at the beginning of the
> grace period.
>
> This commit therefore adds a check for the RCU_GP_FLAG_OVLD flag in
> the post-wakeup "if" statement in rcu_gp_fqs_loop().
>
> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index d0988a1..6226bfb 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -1865,7 +1865,7 @@ static void rcu_gp_fqs_loop(void)
> break;
> /* If time for quiescent-state forcing, do it. */
> if (!time_after(rcu_state.jiffies_force_qs, jiffies) ||
> - (gf & RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS)) {
> + (gf & (RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS | RCU_GP_FLAG_OVLD))) {
> trace_rcu_grace_period(rcu_state.name, rcu_state.gp_seq,
> TPS("fqsstart"));
> rcu_gp_fqs(first_gp_fqs);
>
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-23 6:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-21 18:37 [PATCH] rcu/tree: Force quiescent state on callback overload Neeraj Upadhyay
2020-06-21 19:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-21 20:00 ` Neeraj Upadhyay
2020-06-22 3:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-22 3:46 ` Neeraj Upadhyay
2020-06-22 22:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-23 6:19 ` Neeraj Upadhyay [this message]
2020-06-23 15:42 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-06-23 16:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fdfa6bce-e566-2b04-6be5-e80492a8ae98@codeaurora.org \
--to=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.