Re: [PATCH 6.1.y] selftests/mm: Move default_huge_page_size to vm_util.c

[Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>]

On 22/10/25 15:40, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 01:51:38PM +0800, Leon Hwang wrote:
>> Fix the build error:
>>
>> map_hugetlb.c: In function 'main':
>> map_hugetlb.c:79:25: warning: implicit declaration of function 'default_huge_page_size' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>>    79 |         hugepage_size = default_huge_page_size();
>>       |                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccYOogvJ.o: in function 'main':
>> map_hugetlb.c:(.text+0x114): undefined reference to 'default_huge_page_size'
>>
>> According to the latest selftests, 'default_huge_page_size' has been
>> moved to 'vm_util.c'. So fix the error by the same way.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
>> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
>> ---
>>  tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile      |  1 +
>>  tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c | 24 ------------------------
>>  tools/testing/selftests/vm/vm_util.c     | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>  tools/testing/selftests/vm/vm_util.h     |  1 +
>>  4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> What commit id does this fix?  And again, why not just take the original

Let me check which commit introduced the fix.

> commits instead?

I agree that taking the original commits would be preferable.

However, it might involve quite a few patches to backport, which could
be a bit of work.

If the backport turns out to be too complex, I think it’s acceptable to
leave the build error as-is for now.

Thanks,
Leon

> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h