RE: [PATCH 5/8] ucounts: Handle wrapping in is_ucounts_overlimit

[David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>]

From: Solar Designer
> Sent: 12 February 2022 22:37
...
> bool is_ucounts_overlimit(struct ucounts *ucounts, enum ucount_type type, unsigned long rlimit)
> {
> 	struct ucounts *iter;
> 	long max = rlimit;
> 	if (rlimit > LONG_MAX)
> 		max = LONG_MAX;
> 
> The assignment on "long max = rlimit;" would have already been UB if
> "rlimit > LONG_MAX", which is only checked afterwards.  I think the
> above would be better written as:

I'm pretty sure assignments and casts of negative values to unsigned
types are actually well defined.
Although the actual value may differ for ones-compliment and
sign-overpunch systems.
But I suspect Linux requires twos-compliment negative numbers.

(In much the same way as it requires that NULL be the all zero
bit pattern - although a load of annoying compiler warnings are only
relevant if that isn't the case.)

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)