From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-fetch: more terse fetch output
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 23:02:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fgir54$7ft$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20071103210321.GA25685@glandium.org
Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 04:50:54PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> [ heh, I knew someone would say something ]
>>
>> Yes, to me, 1MB is 1024 KB. Always been, until those idiotic hard disk
>> manufacturers decided to redefine the common interpretation of what
>> everyone else used to consider what a MB is just to boost their
>> marketing claims.
>
> How many grams in a kilogram ? How many meters in a kilometer ? How many
> joule in a kilojoule ? ... How many bytes in a kilobyte ? Oh wait...
>
> And you know what ? It's not only a matter of hard disk manufacturers.
>
> How fast is gigabit ethernet ? Yep, 1000000000 bits/s
> How big would people say a 44000000 bytes file is ? 44MB or 42MB ?
> And my favourite: How many bytes in a 1.44MB floppy disk ? 1474560, that
> is, 1.44 * 1024000.
>
> Those who made this big mess are the ones who decided a KB was 1024
> bytes, not the others.
No, the problem is that in _computer science_ kB (or KB) was 1024 bytes,
and MB was 1024 kilobytes, because 1024 is a power of 2, and for example
naturally the memory which can be adressed comes as a power of 2.
Now in other parts of science k means 1000, and M means 1000000. To make
the computer sciences meaning of kB explicit SI introduced ki and Mi prefix.
And manufacturers claiming HDD size x GB in the SI meaning took part...
--
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-03 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-03 5:32 [PATCH] git-fetch: more terse fetch output Nicolas Pitre
2007-11-03 5:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-11-03 19:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-11-03 20:30 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-11-03 20:40 ` Mike Hommey
2007-11-03 20:50 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-11-03 21:03 ` Mike Hommey
2007-11-03 21:46 ` Pierre Habouzit
2007-11-03 22:02 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2007-11-03 22:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-11-03 23:31 ` Mike Hommey
2007-11-04 0:54 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-04 1:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-11-04 1:49 ` David Brown
2007-11-04 2:14 ` Robin Rosenberg
2007-11-03 22:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-11-04 9:56 ` Steffen Prohaska
2007-11-04 4:58 ` Jeff King
2007-11-04 13:13 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-04 14:01 ` Pierre Habouzit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='fgir54$7ft$1@ger.gmane.org' \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.