From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JRtrI-0000Fa-RU for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:39:58 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JRtqG-0001pZ-SH for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:38:52 +0000 Received: from ip-62-143-227-114.1411n-cud12k-01.ish.de ([62.143.227.114]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:38:52 +0000 Received: from no2spam by ip-62-143-227-114.1411n-cud12k-01.ish.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:38:52 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Rolf Leggewie Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:38:40 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20080220015817.1e33f547@widy.localdomain> <20080220020418.1e4dda5a@widy.localdomain> <1203502545.6860.13.camel@hammer.suse.cz> <20080220155339.67aed5d4@widy.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip-62-143-227-114.1411n-cud12k-01.ish.de User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) In-Reply-To: <20080220155339.67aed5d4@widy.localdomain> Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.2 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on serenity X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.3 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:39:36 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: what is a fixed bug? (was: [oe-commits] org.oe.dev - Ignore false toggle signals (work-around for OE#3390).) X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:39:59 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > feeds. So, if bug is fixed in source, but corresponding package hasn't > made to feeds, then per above idea (hopefully pretty obvious and > no-nonsense), the bug should not be closed. I disagree (see mail about Angstrom usurping bugs.oe.org). I have yet to come up with a complete plan how things should work (one idea fell apart because a partner had to retract their offer). But let's discuss this piece since it came up: when to consider a normal bug closed. The above are really two or more issues. a) fix the problem itself b) propagate the fix to A* c) propagate the fix to PS Distro IMO, any bug fixed in .dev ought to be closed. If it needs to be backported or released to A*, then a separate ticket should be opened (one issue, one bug, remember!). The cloning function from bugzilla can easily be used for that. We just face the problem that - unlike launchpad - bugzilla is incapable of tracking the status according to project for the same issue (open for ubuntu, closed in debian for example)