From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JS9nP-0008SI-K1 for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:41:04 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JS9nK-0003nt-0e for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:40:54 +0000 Received: from ip-62-143-227-114.1411n-cud12k-01.ish.de ([62.143.227.114]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:40:54 +0000 Received: from no2spam by ip-62-143-227-114.1411n-cud12k-01.ish.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:40:54 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Rolf Leggewie Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:40:48 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20080220213121.69007f37@widy.localdomain> <1203591205.6860.103.camel@hammer.suse.cz> <20080221131810.2f58c40e@widy.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip-62-143-227-114.1411n-cud12k-01.ish.de User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) In-Reply-To: <20080221131810.2f58c40e@widy.localdomain> Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.2 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on serenity X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.3 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:39:36 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [Angstrom-devel] Best place to send new/updated bb files? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:41:07 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Paul Sokolovsky wrote: >> Simple search shows 50 potential open bugs with new recipes: >> http://bugs.openembedded.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&long_desc_type=substring&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailassigned_to2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailcc2=1&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=attachments.filename&type0-0-0=substring&value0-0-0=.bb > We even have http://bugs.openembedded.net/show_bug.cgi?id=2194 , > maintained by Rolf. Thanks for bringing that up. I'd like to see more core devs pay attention to 2194 which is essentially the bug "I reviewed it, it contains a patch or request for change in unmistakable terms, but it touches something I don't understand and might have too far-reaching implication for me to dare and commit it" - triaged. IOW, it needs more experienced people to actually commit or reject the bug. The bug with the new or updated bb files is 2228, not 2194.