From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org)
	by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68)
	(envelope-from <gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1JSAKi-0000nR-Md
	for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:15:30 +0100
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JSAKc-0005f6-I0
	for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:15:18 +0000
Received: from ip-62-143-227-114.1411n-cud12k-01.ish.de ([62.143.227.114])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <openembedded-devel@openembedded.org>;
	Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:15:18 +0000
Received: from no2spam by ip-62-143-227-114.1411n-cud12k-01.ish.de with local
	(Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <openembedded-devel@openembedded.org>;
	Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:15:18 +0000
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org
From: Rolf Leggewie <no2spam@nospam.arcornews.de>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:15:01 +0100
Message-ID: <fpjq04$8hf$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <fb8538570802200452r5d4360f2ld6330218f4c5c0b6@mail.gmail.com>	<20080220213121.69007f37@widy.localdomain>	<1203591205.6860.103.camel@hammer.suse.cz>	<20080221131810.2f58c40e@widy.localdomain>	<fpjo00$218$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<20080221140821.6c5ec794@widy.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip-62-143-227-114.1411n-cud12k-01.ish.de
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022)
In-Reply-To: <20080221140821.6c5ec794@widy.localdomain>
Sender: news <news@ger.gmane.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.2
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on serenity
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no
	version=3.2.3
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:39:36 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org)
Subject: Re: [Angstrom-devel] Best place to send new/updated bb files?
X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions
	<openembedded-devel.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel>,
	<mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel>,
	<mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:15:32 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> Like that, except not "core devs", but just "devs". If OE must depend
> on core devs for each sneeze, then it's feet-tied. Core devs should
> work on general problems and rules for OE, not on mundane recipes.

you still mix up bug 2228 and 2194

And, recipes are anything but mundane.  How about some respect for the
people that maintain them, including the core devs?