From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JSAjI-0005x5-V1 for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:40:57 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JSAjA-0006v2-Fc for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:40:40 +0000 Received: from ip-62-143-227-114.1411n-cud12k-01.ish.de ([62.143.227.114]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:40:40 +0000 Received: from no2spam by ip-62-143-227-114.1411n-cud12k-01.ish.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:40:40 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Rolf Leggewie Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:40:35 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20080220015817.1e33f547@widy.localdomain> <20080220020418.1e4dda5a@widy.localdomain> <1203502545.6860.13.camel@hammer.suse.cz> <20080220155339.67aed5d4@widy.localdomain> <20080220212639.6e24e7ab@widy.localdomain> <20080221140439.2612fffe@widy.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip-62-143-227-114.1411n-cud12k-01.ish.de User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) In-Reply-To: <20080221140439.2612fffe@widy.localdomain> Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.2 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on serenity X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.3 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:39:36 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: what is a fixed bug? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:40:58 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Paul, let's make your long story short. Essentially, the question amounts to whether I (and everybody else) need to consult with A* people first before closing a bug that is fixed in .dev from now on? Once we have established that, we can either outright forget about my proposal, accept it or try and find something better. My interpretation: * I believe we have already heard the result of that vote previously, but it seems you did not get the message, so I guess the question needs to be answered again. RP? * I already mentioned that IMHO A* should heartily embrace the changes I proposed because of the benefits it brings to them, but A* is free to reject my ideas. But IMNSHO it cannot and should not force their rejection on others who use OE as a basis IMNSHO. Regards Rolf PS: I'd also like you to finally stop your (unfounded) accusations against my person.