From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JSCKn-0008Qd-Dr for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:24:17 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JSCKc-0003RM-5d for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:23:26 +0000 Received: from ip-62-143-227-114.1411n-cud12k-01.ish.de ([62.143.227.114]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:23:26 +0000 Received: from no2spam by ip-62-143-227-114.1411n-cud12k-01.ish.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:23:26 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Rolf Leggewie Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:23:17 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20080220015817.1e33f547@widy.localdomain> <20080220020418.1e4dda5a@widy.localdomain> <1203502545.6860.13.camel@hammer.suse.cz> <20080220155339.67aed5d4@widy.localdomain> <20080220212639.6e24e7ab@widy.localdomain> <20080221140439.2612fffe@widy.localdomain> <20080221151126.243a718f@widy.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip-62-143-227-114.1411n-cud12k-01.ish.de User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) In-Reply-To: <20080221151126.243a718f@widy.localdomain> Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.2 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on serenity X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.3 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:39:36 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: what is a fixed bug? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:24:17 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > it cannot change immediately to something else. > > Otherwise, I'm all for the changes you propose Great. Sorry I missed that drift. I am certainly more than willing to try and understand the Angstrom position and accomodate them where possible (I think that should have been clear from my previous responses where I indicated the benefit I see for A*). Angstrom plays an important role for OE, no doubt about that. > - if they will work. I'd propose to try the process out. I think you will even like it. Maybe I was also misunderstood in that I think we need to have two bugs for everything now, absolutely not. My proposition is to just close bugs when a fix has been pushed to .dev. Angstrom should then keep a watch on things and if necessary clone a bug that still needs fixing in .stable (when for some reason the push cannot be done immediately). Take look at bug 3838 which I created for illustration purposes of how I think this should be done. Regards Rolf