From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: [RFE] git rebase doesn't say it failed Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:53:58 +0100 Organization: At home Message-ID: References: <429AC7A2-511E-496F-9C1C-4627604EBBFB@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Mar 10 12:55:50 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JYgbc-00082a-3X for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:55:48 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750799AbYCJLzK convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 07:55:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750703AbYCJLzJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 07:55:09 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:48062 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750696AbYCJLzI (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 07:55:08 -0400 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JYgas-0006wF-U5 for git@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:55:02 +0000 Received: from abwl132.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl ([83.8.235.132]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:55:02 +0000 Received: from jnareb by abwl132.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:55:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: abwl132.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl Mail-Copies-To: Jakub Narebski User-Agent: KNode/0.10.2 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin wrote: >> Git was unable to rebase due to the files above. =A0Please commit th= em or move >> them out of the way. >> Hint: See "git reset --help" for a suggestion about saving work in p= rogress. >=20 > The same comment I gave last week applies here: people complained tha= t Git=20 > was too chatty. =A0I tend to agree, since the important information w= as lost=20 > in the huge amount of text. =A0Now you say we should make it chatty a= gain? --verbose option, anyone? --=20 Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git