From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JZ221-0007h2-He for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:48:37 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JZ202-0007um-U5 for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:46:26 +0000 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:46:26 +0000 Received: from koen by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:46:26 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:46:09 +0100 Message-ID: References: <200803110807.11368.zecke@selfish.org> <200803111126.04715.openembedded@haerwu.biz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) In-Reply-To: <200803111126.04715.openembedded@haerwu.biz> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.2 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on serenity X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.3 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:39:36 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: Reconsidering the work flow and how the SCM system fits in X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:48:39 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Marcin Juszkiewicz schreef: | When I have to choose between Mercurial (hg) and GIT I prefer to choose | GIT. It is because this one is more known to me and I know that it has | large users base. I also knew developers with lot of git experience so it | is easier to seek for help. CVS also has a large user base and lots of OE developers have lots of experience with it. See why those are bad arguments? Since Holger wants to switch for *technical* reasons we shouldn't allow such "OMG GIT IS POPULAR LOL" arguments. And I bet there will be people saying "OE always to be special" if we (again) stay clear from git and choose hg. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFH1mLxMkyGM64RGpERApj6AKCldx9gsg7jlexKcOhqudSnS7ZYNACgjQ5J GFEniWLfB5l40L5OKrlbddI= =pgJy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----