From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JZ4jQ-0001nK-GE for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:41:49 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JZ4hU-00081F-T8 for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:39:28 +0000 Received: from wlan141019.mobiel.utwente.nl ([130.89.141.19]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:39:28 +0000 Received: from koen by wlan141019.mobiel.utwente.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:39:28 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:39:16 +0100 Message-ID: References: <200803110807.11368.zecke@selfish.org> <200803111126.04715.openembedded@haerwu.biz> <20080311114938.GM30267@ibawizard.net> <20080311142330.35139ee1@widy.localdomain> <47D687F5.90604@kernelconcepts.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: wlan141019.mobiel.utwente.nl User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) In-Reply-To: <47D687F5.90604@kernelconcepts.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.2 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on serenity X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.3 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:39:36 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: Reconsidering the work flow and how the SCM system fits in X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:41:52 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Florian Boor schreef: | Hi, | | Paul Sokolovsky schrieb: |> That's because you don't know hg. Scientific studies has proven it to |> be 27.92% easier. | | I'm tempted to agree blindly ;) Where did you find this? | *If* the user interaction of hg is much better than git then this would be a | reason to prefer hg. When I tested hg during the previous scm round it was way easier to use than git, most likely because it's modeled after mtn, without the annoying bugs like non-content conflicts and slowness. Have a look at http://www.ivy.fr/mercurial/ref/v1.0/Mercurial-QuickStart-v1.0-120dpi.png btw, sun picked hg for their opensolaris stuff. regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFH1ouDMkyGM64RGpERAjstAJ99n8IfV0DX2zpVcri9nZbDGH3PQwCgrpCI ZR7nyf2/jXJtOUfo05Ltk8Q= =wUS/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----