From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JZ76T-0005Yx-HU for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:13:58 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JZ74X-0007TN-F5 for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:11:25 +0000 Received: from wlan141019.mobiel.utwente.nl ([130.89.141.19]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:11:25 +0000 Received: from koen by wlan141019.mobiel.utwente.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:11:25 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:11:12 +0100 Message-ID: References: <200803110807.11368.zecke@selfish.org> <20080311120056.748ec358@widy.localdomain> <20080311101433.77a09fd2@cimmeria> <200803111514.49573.zecke@selfish.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: wlan141019.mobiel.utwente.nl User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) In-Reply-To: <200803111514.49573.zecke@selfish.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.2 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on serenity X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.3 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:39:36 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: Reconsidering the work flow and how the SCM system fits in X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:14:07 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Holger Freyther schreef: | PS: git-add -i and git-rebase -i really won me over That's the fundamental difference between git and other (D)SCMs: git is for generating clean patches ready for e-mail, the others are for recording history. So the real questions are: - - Are we going to mail around patches, or are we going to pull changes from (remote) branches directly? - - Do we want to keep an accurate record of our tries to get things right or do we want a clean, compact (and technically incomplete) history? regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFH1q8gMkyGM64RGpERAu3kAKCu1egI5CMdAHNQWDYk0nA4W7nxXACfcag3 gDTbF9G9lDlAZirw8TRQP0U= =PSs/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----