From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JZWDc-0006pE-5M for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:02:45 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JZWBV-0000Hh-4z for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:00:17 +0000 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:00:17 +0000 Received: from koen by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:00:17 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:00:10 +0100 Message-ID: References: <200803110807.11368.zecke@selfish.org> <200803111126.04715.openembedded@haerwu.biz> <20080311114938.GM30267@ibawizard.net> <20080311145739.GN30267@ibawizard.net> <1205250588.4521.111.camel@dax.rpnet.com> <20080312014945.4783ae6a@widy.localdomain> <1205280598.16531.26.camel@dax.rpnet.com> <20080312024408.44d9192e@widy.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.2 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on serenity X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.3 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:39:36 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: Reconsidering the work flow and how the SCM system fits in X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:02:48 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Leon Woestenberg schreef: | Hello all, | | having very little experience with both git and hg, I needed to look | for other people's thoughts on this. | I found this e-mail from Carl Worth extremely insightfull in the | decision for either hg or git: | | http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/cairo/2006-February/006255.html | | His arguments on the (main two) differences strongly favors me to move | to GIT, not HG. Actually it shows that hg fits better into the OE way of using a DSCM: central repo (and mirrors) with distributed developers. I keep hearing people saying that they have no clue on how to setup a git-server for OE where we can commit things as usual, while with hg it's just 'hg serve'. regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFH2Cg6MkyGM64RGpERArCvAJ0ZOXNRysB3/I5HNJwuhto25TrXAQCffaad VD7lvC0aO123KP3MOPDtweU= =aHj0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----