From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JZvbi-0000Xq-Km for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:09:04 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JZvZV-0000Bu-8R for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:06:45 +0000 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:06:45 +0000 Received: from koen by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:06:45 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:06:32 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1205444019.4547.192.camel@dax.rpnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) In-Reply-To: <1205444019.4547.192.camel@dax.rpnet.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.2 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on serenity X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.3 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:39:36 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: Packaged Staging - 'Current' Status X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:09:04 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Richard Purdie schreef: | As has been mentioned, I'm working on integrating packaged staging and | its about time I mentioned the current status. I say 'current' as it | applies to what I have offline, not what's in OE.dev. I have a few questions that I can't deduce an answer to from your description: ~ * How does packaged-staging handle switching ANGSTROM_MODE? If the packaged-staging-packages (p-s-ps) get seperated by target tuple it should be ok, and if the p-s-ps dir can be overriden (e.g. PS_STAGING_DIR = foo/bar/${ANGSTROM_MODE}) we should be safe as well. ~ * do we have 'one' staging dir as we have now, or can each package have its own staging dir built from its DEPENDS? I know that this largely depends on how fast/well we debug sysroot stuff, but I'm curious how this is in your current design. ~ * will p-s.bbclass be package format agnostic, or are we going to insist on opkg? I know from experience that making it format agnostic isn't hard, only tedious, but most of all subject to combinatorial explosion for unit-testing. It also doesn't really matter, since p-s-ps are orthogonal to the ones in deploy, but I can image OE-newbies freaking out over this. regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFH2aVoMkyGM64RGpERAor2AKC2XM/v+c6hQFsZTZdv5F2dtMRFawCgpgAD ZT5JM2KOiqUyTLNY3A6n4Io= =T4cR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----