From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JeuY0-0001i7-Fh for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:01:48 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JeuXx-0002im-Eq for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:01:45 +0000 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:01:45 +0000 Received: from koen by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:01:45 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:01:34 +0100 Message-ID: References: <47EAEB1D.9060004@xora.org.uk> <200803270349.59619.zecke@selfish.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) In-Reply-To: <200803270349.59619.zecke@selfish.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Sender: news Subject: Re: SCM scorecards X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:01:48 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Holger Freyther schreef: | On Thursday 27 March 2008 01:32:29 Graeme Gregory wrote: |> Moving a private discussion public I started to add a quick score card for |> SCM's |> |> This is currently how I see feature support. |> |> So far we seem to have this list where goodness is 1-5 (5 being good) |> |> CPU Load Git 5 Monotone 3 |> Ease of branching Git 5 Monotone 5 |> Ease of Branch Merging Git 4 Monotone 3 |> Ease of Serving Git 1 Monotone 5 |> Ease of Distributed SCM Git 2 Monotone 5 |> |> |> Im sure there is more scores we can add to this list. And you might not |> agree with my scores, but it seems pretty close so far. | | Ease of publishing branches Git 5 Monotone 0: | Reasoning: | With git, I push and transfer the number of bytes that I have changed | to the server. So a small change is a small upload. | | With mtn (0.37 here) in contrast it wants to upload every revision to the | server. I'm on a GPRS/UMTS/CDMA line and after ~48MB of upload I got | disconnected, twice. The revs still reside on my disk only, I'm not able | to share it. The database is locked during this operation, I can not do | diffs, commits, checkouts during this time. | | Publishing means uploading what we have created, which is a lot bigger than | just my small change. | That's because you used the wrong branch include pattern when pushing, you did: ~ mtn push host org.foo.zecke1 you want: ~ mtn push host org.foo.{original,zecke1} the second will only transfer new revs, instead of marking all revs with the new branch cert and (re)transferring them. regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFH68TeMkyGM64RGpERAkRrAJ9/ZSoJcXU7RZ0SbxFkOipn3UK7uQCffULq StJJ+msJRiaQLVBwCyR6PEE= =DX14 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----