From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Jf8dC-0007WY-Ru for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 08:04:06 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Jf8d9-0003Sk-2g for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 07:04:03 +0000 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 07:04:03 +0000 Received: from koen by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 07:04:03 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 08:03:49 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1206638249.4514.57.camel@dax.rpnet.com> <1206659222.4514.59.camel@dax.rpnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) In-Reply-To: <1206659222.4514.59.camel@dax.rpnet.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Sender: news Subject: kernel breackage, was Re: ipkg/opkg offical response X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 07:04:07 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Richard Purdie schreef: | On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 20:25 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: |> Richard Purdie schreef: |> |> | * Adding do_deploy to packaged-staging's knowledge. This is best done |> | with the patch for kernel.bbclass that thesing was been working on. I've |> | made some suggestions for tweaks (looking at the version already in |> | poky) and suggested he commits it after that. |> |> That patch broke uImage kernels *real bad*, I just pushed a fix for it. |> |> Proper review on mailinglist first next time? | | Well, it was posted for review on the mailing list and I was one of the | few people who actually responded ;-). You're being deliberatly obtuse. http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2008-March/004613.html looks nothing like the patch that was committed, it doesn't have bugs Jeremy and I fixed. Or are you saying it's okay that people commit something different than what was reviewed? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFH7JhVMkyGM64RGpERAjcBAJ44PFUYtx86MAFoPwCQfJLGbUjxTACePy/y KdT7FnpKR9ElE/JNayfIqww= =JaFL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----