From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JgEF1-0008DO-Ql for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:15:39 +0200 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JgEEx-00008Q-09 for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 07:15:35 +0000 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 07:15:34 +0000 Received: from koen by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 07:15:34 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:15:25 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1206919092.4838.23.camel@dax.rpnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) In-Reply-To: <1206919092.4838.23.camel@dax.rpnet.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Sender: news Subject: Re: Old bitkeeper repository X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 07:15:39 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Richard Purdie schreef: | Hi, | | I've been experimenting with the bitkeeper cvs dump we have of the OE | repository that was there. I'm planning on turning this into a git | repository so we can more easily see what was in there. I did that for hg a while ago: http://ewi546.ewi.utwente.nl:8000/ | If we did switch to git/hg/scm of the month, what commit ids would we | want to be using? I'd say we stick the the current ones and turn those into working email addresses for everyone. regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFH8I+NMkyGM64RGpERAi3QAJ9bQxDGO6o2Wutx5xD4UnYzBJUJVgCfXaap wOunXG9pWE7mkK7RvPHDTkA= =MoEP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----