From: "Thomas Bächler" <thomas@archlinux.org>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ipw3945-devel] iwl3945: Disabled channels
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:38:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fuiccr$keo$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <480C5AFF.5020005@fenrir.org.uk>
Brian Morrison schrieb:
> options cfg80211 ieee80211_regdom="JP"
Band 1:
Frequencies:
* 2412 MHz
* 2417 MHz
* 2422 MHz
* 2427 MHz
* 2432 MHz
* 2437 MHz
* 2442 MHz
* 2447 MHz
* 2452 MHz
* 2457 MHz
* 2462 MHz
* 2467 MHz (passive scanning, no IBSS)
* 2472 MHz (passive scanning, no IBSS)
Bitrates:
* 1.0 Mbps
* 2.0 Mbps (short preamble supported)
* 5.5 Mbps (short preamble supported)
* 11.0 Mbps (short preamble supported)
* 6.0 Mbps
* 9.0 Mbps
* 12.0 Mbps
* 18.0 Mbps
* 24.0 Mbps
* 36.0 Mbps
* 48.0 Mbps
* 54.0 Mbps
Band 2:
Frequencies:
* 5170 MHz (passive scanning, no IBSS)
* 5180 MHz
* 5190 MHz (passive scanning, no IBSS)
* 5200 MHz
* 5210 MHz (passive scanning, no IBSS)
* 5220 MHz
* 5230 MHz (passive scanning, no IBSS)
* 5240 MHz
* 5260 MHz (passive scanning, no IBSS, radar detection)
* 5280 MHz (passive scanning, no IBSS, radar detection)
* 5300 MHz (passive scanning, no IBSS, radar detection)
* 5320 MHz (passive scanning, no IBSS, radar detection)
* 5500 MHz (disabled, passive scanning, no IBSS, radar detection)
* 5520 MHz (disabled, passive scanning, no IBSS, radar detection)
* 5540 MHz (disabled, passive scanning, no IBSS, radar detection)
* 5560 MHz (disabled, passive scanning, no IBSS, radar detection)
* 5580 MHz (disabled, passive scanning, no IBSS, radar detection)
* 5600 MHz (disabled, passive scanning, no IBSS, radar detection)
* 5620 MHz (disabled, passive scanning, no IBSS, radar detection)
* 5640 MHz (disabled, passive scanning, no IBSS, radar detection)
* 5660 MHz (disabled, passive scanning, no IBSS, radar detection)
* 5680 MHz (disabled, passive scanning, no IBSS, radar detection)
* 5700 MHz (disabled, passive scanning, no IBSS, radar detection)
Bitrates:
* 6.0 Mbps
* 9.0 Mbps
* 12.0 Mbps
* 18.0 Mbps
* 24.0 Mbps
* 36.0 Mbps
* 48.0 Mbps
* 54.0 Mbps
This look better, although I have to wait until tomorrow to see if the
Access Point in question uses one of the now enabled 11a channels.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-21 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fuhkfp$mnk$1@ger.gmane.org>
2008-04-21 9:14 ` [ipw3945-devel] iwl3945: Disabled channels Brian Morrison
2008-04-21 13:50 ` Johannes Berg
2008-04-21 14:19 ` Brian Morrison
2008-04-21 14:41 ` Johannes Berg
2008-04-21 15:01 ` Brian Morrison
2008-04-21 15:12 ` Johannes Berg
2008-04-21 15:36 ` Brian Morrison
2008-04-21 14:28 ` Brian Morrison
2008-04-21 15:38 ` Thomas Bächler [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='fuiccr$keo$1@ger.gmane.org' \
--to=thomas@archlinux.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.