From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Jqd1A-0002gx-3L for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 01:44:20 +0200 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Jqd0k-0005oR-Hn for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:43:54 +0000 Received: from ip-62-143-23-251.1411n-cud12k-01.ish.de ([62.143.23.251]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:43:54 +0000 Received: from no2spam by ip-62-143-23-251.1411n-cud12k-01.ish.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:43:54 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Rolf Leggewie Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 01:43:50 +0200 Message-ID: References: <200804281344.32507.zecke@selfish.org> <200804281639.04704.zecke@selfish.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip-62-143-23-251.1411n-cud12k-01.ish.de User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) In-Reply-To: <200804281639.04704.zecke@selfish.org> Sender: news Subject: Re: Summary of an unwanted merge and what I did X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10b4 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:44:20 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Holger Freyther wrote: > it is about time to switch I believe the discussion has been done. I agree, action should follow. What are the next steps? Do we want a vote on which tool to use? I see three contenders. a) stick with mtn b) switch to hg c) switch git I don't recollect anybody advocating anything else. So, should we have a vote on a, b, or is there some technical issue that needs to resolved or evaluated first?