From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JtlyC-0008Qj-Qj for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Wed, 07 May 2008 17:54:16 +0200 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Jtlxb-0003Zf-Od for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Wed, 07 May 2008 15:53:39 +0000 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 07 May 2008 15:53:39 +0000 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 07 May 2008 15:53:39 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 17:53:29 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Thunderbird 3.0a1pre (Macintosh/2008040803) In-Reply-To: Sender: news Subject: Re: bp flag added to bug tracker (org.openembedded.stable) X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10b4 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 15:54:17 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Rolf Leggewie wrote: > Koen Kooi wrote: >> If you think you have patches that should get applied to the >> stablebranch, please post them for review on the stablebranch >> mailinglist. > > Would it be OK if I directed you to http://tinyurl.com/63674m instead? > Maybe you can save this search in your bugzilla account? These are > patches tagged with the bp keyword request. Navigating bugzilla is sadly on the wrong side of my motivation (read: available time) threshold. Why? Because I spend a lot of time offline (no access to bugzilla) and I do have a local copy of the stablebranch mail folder. I'm sure I can configure bugzilla to mail me and all that, but I honestly have no time or inclination to look into that right now. > The Stable branch devs can > then ACK or NACK the patch right in the bug tracker. Second person to > ACK makes the commit to .stable. Isn't this the kind of review process > we are looking for? Maybe you can over time move the complete review > process away from the mailing list and into bugzilla. That would be my > suggestion. Moving to bugzilla would be a good thing, but the policy right now works for the stable branch maintainers quite well and fits with out "lifestyle" (read: available time). It's nothing against you or bugzilla, just people being (too) busy. regards, Koen