From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ju68u-0004ea-FP for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 08 May 2008 15:26:40 +0200 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Ju68F-000358-Fw for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 08 May 2008 13:25:59 +0000 Received: from wlan140130.mobiel.utwente.nl ([130.89.140.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 08 May 2008 13:25:59 +0000 Received: from k.kooi by wlan140130.mobiel.utwente.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 08 May 2008 13:25:59 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 15:25:50 +0200 Message-ID: References: <74d0deb30805080534v6be5f293xa14fe5c159968555@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: wlan140130.mobiel.utwente.nl User-Agent: Thunderbird 3.0a1pre (Macintosh/2008042803) In-Reply-To: <74d0deb30805080534v6be5f293xa14fe5c159968555@mail.gmail.com> Sender: news Subject: Re: Disapproval of revision b8e46b797b32111526a2116d020fdd9e1c079965 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10b4 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 13:26:40 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit pHilipp Zabel wrote: > On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Rolf Leggewie > wrote: >> Koen, >> >> thank you for continuing to keep such a close watch on every single >> commit I make and raising hell every time you find a chance. > > Actually, I was just about to do the same thing (reverting, sending a > notification, wouldn't call that raising hell) when I noticed Koen's > disapproval, so thanks for the quick fix. > Just saying, this is because gmp is a pretty prominent package, not > because Koen is closely watching your every step. Of course the latter > part is only an assumption. I've been (trying) to build x11-image from scratch for various targets the past week and fix any breakages I encounter. If you check the commit messages you'll see that I'm also raising hell for the breakage Mickeyl was so kind to add (removing packages that angstrom has as PREFERRED_VERSION, etc). It's nothing personal, Rolf just happened to be the person that made the same mistake twice in a week. FWIW: bitbake -c patch is IO limited, no cpu limited.