From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JzFVA-0007Zo-Mi for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 22 May 2008 20:27:19 +0200 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JzFSV-0007sY-SR for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 22 May 2008 18:24:12 +0000 Received: from ip-62-143-23-251.hsi.ish.de ([62.143.23.251]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 22 May 2008 18:24:11 +0000 Received: from no2spam by ip-62-143-23-251.hsi.ish.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 22 May 2008 18:24:11 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Rolf Leggewie Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 20:24:04 +0200 Message-ID: References: <70c9a9110805220710x6663f582lc5d6b75744960d08@mail.gmail.com> <70c9a9110805220711i33fd397k518855a05773edf0@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip-62-143-23-251.hsi.ish.de User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505) In-Reply-To: <70c9a9110805220711i33fd397k518855a05773edf0@mail.gmail.com> Sender: news Subject: Re: GCC 4.3 fails to build glibc(-intermediate) X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 18:27:37 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Enric Balletbò i Serra wrote: > I have the same problem, but at this moment I don't have idea about solution. I am also experiencing similar problems for a spitz build. The problem started to appear about a week ago. f2497299e919cb94e12fc8690a709479451e5510 still builds fine. I think the most likely candidates that triggered this problem are to be found among the changes to gcc that were made after that revision. I see changes from koen and RP in the commit-ml. It would be nice if the people who understand this stuff took a look to spot a possible regression. I will try and narrow the revision down further. http://oss.leggewie.org/wip/f2497299e919cb94e12fc8690a709479451e5510_vs_HEAD.txt