From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org)
	by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1K7DF7-0003GR-9k
	for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:39:21 +0200
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1K7DEq-0005Ae-UJ
	for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 17:39:00 +0000
Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <openembedded-devel@openembedded.org>;
	Fri, 13 Jun 2008 17:39:00 +0000
Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1
	(Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <openembedded-devel@openembedded.org>;
	Fri, 13 Jun 2008 17:39:00 +0000
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org
From: Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:38:50 +0200
Message-ID: <g2ubb9$a55$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <1213345201.13942.3.camel@dax.rpnet.com>	<74d0deb30806130306tf5ca604t7238ab26d715e03@mail.gmail.com>	<g2tv3m$t5l$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<74d0deb30806130925u7ec0c1e4sfdf2144e703f2b9a@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl
User-Agent: Thunderbird 3.0a2pre (Macintosh/2008060303)
In-Reply-To: <74d0deb30806130925u7ec0c1e4sfdf2144e703f2b9a@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: news <news@ger.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Switching SCM to git and commit/review policy
X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10
Precedence: list
Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions
	<openembedded-devel.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/openembedded-devel>,
	<mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel>,
	<mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 17:39:29 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

pHilipp Zabel wrote:

>>> Personally, I'd like to see every patch to OE being sent to and
>>> reviewed on the mailing list.
>> I'd like to see that every commit has at least 2 SOBs, I care less on how
>> they get there. Having the review out in the open should be the end goal,
>> though.
>
>  From Documentation/SubmittingPatches:
> "The Signed-off-by: tag indicates that the signer was involved in the
> development of the patch, or that he/she was in the patch's delivery path."
>
> In the kernel Signed-off-by is primarily used to mark the way a patch
> took into the kernel. If we do this, maybe we should use the same
> nomenclature and have Acked-by for statements of approval. (And
> eventually Tested-by/Reviewed-by, too?)

That is probably a good idea.

regards,

Koen