From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KIpTm-0006gh-Oo for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:42:26 -0700 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1KIpTl-0008VK-9X for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:42:26 -0700 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KIpTd-0006JH-Ps for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:42:17 +0000 Received: from c-67-160-201-246.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([67.160.201.246]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:42:17 +0000 Received: from dpejesh by c-67-160-201-246.hsd1.ca.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:42:17 +0000 From: David Shane Holden Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:42:05 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1214488251-20927-1-git-send-email-bhalevy@panasas.com> <20080715162400.GC12154@c2.user-mode-linux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20080715162400.GC12154@c2.user-mode-linux.org> Subject: [SPAM] Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] fix extern inline errors with gcc 4.3.0 List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Jeff Dike wrote: > On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:30:15AM -0700, David Shane Holden wrote: >> I tried to build a UML 2.6.26 kernel on Debian (32-bit) and ran into the >> same problem reported here http://marc.info/?t=121011533500002&r=1&w=2. > > It's really 2.6.26, and not something from a day or two earlier? I > fixed the compilation bugs, supposedly, just before 2.6.26. Yeah, it's a vanilla 2.6.26, and when comparing it to 2.6.26-rc9 the only difference in arch/um was the change for no-unit-at-a-time. > >> If I use gcc 4.3 everything works fine, but if I use gcc 4.1 or 4.2, >> UML crashes on startup. > > If the crash says ptrace in it, then I'm currently trying to figure > out what's happening with that. It's crashing in wait_stub_done just like the poster of the message was having, it appears gcc 4.1 and 4.2 need -fno-unit-at-a-time. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel