From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KSt9W-0003T4-0x for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:39:06 +0200 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KSt8w-0000hJ-CF for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:38:30 +0000 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:38:30 +0000 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:38:30 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:38:16 +0200 Message-ID: References: <200808121422.10430.mickey@vanille-media.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Thunderbird/3.0b1pre (Macintosh; 2008080700) In-Reply-To: <200808121422.10430.mickey@vanille-media.de> Sender: news Subject: Re: openembedded.net status? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:39:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > Am Dienstag 12 August 2008 13:47:26 schrieb Koen Kooi: >> if so, why is it taking so *$($*(@$*(@ long? > > No idea. That's the drawback of using donated services. The one in charge of > colocation is not in germany right now, according to him he notified the > computing centre, but i have yet to get an update from them. Since I don't > even have an account at the computing centre, it's a bit tough for me to put > pressure on those guys. Thanks, that clears things up a bit. All I knew that is was down and that there were no messages what happened and what steps are being taken to fix it. Isn't there a remote powerswitch that can get flipped like strato has? > I know it's always annoying when a server goes down, but this arrangement was > the best we could do and it worked well until now, so let's not freak out and > hope it's coming back soon. Can we point DNS back to ltg in the meantime? Having a page saying we're down is way better than having all website timeout. regards, Koen