From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KSzmA-000887-LV for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:43:26 +0200 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KSzld-0002fx-0l for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:42:53 +0000 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:42:53 +0000 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:42:53 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:42:36 +0200 Message-ID: References: <48A1D100.8070102@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Thunderbird/3.0b1pre (Macintosh; 2008080700) In-Reply-To: <48A1D100.8070102@gmx.net> Sender: news Subject: Re: oprofile updates X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:43:26 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Robert Schuster wrote: > Hi, > as you might have seen I committed a patch for oprofile 0.9.3 and added > 0.9.4. > > 0.9.3 was applying a patch that adds armv7 support but the CPU event > files were not distributed because the patch modified a Makefile.in > (which was overwritten since OE does autogen.sh/autoreconf). > > To my surprise the armv7 patch is still needed for 0.9.4 (although it > was created months ago). So I adjusted it for this version. > > Oprofile 0.9.4 is interesting because it > - supports the avr32 CPUs > - provides libopagent > > The latter is hot stuff for JIT compilers: With the library you can tell > oprofile that a JIT-created area of machine code has a certain name. > With the name and the instruction sequence itself oprofile can then > provide the same level of detailed information as it provides for normal > C and C++ functions. > > Needless to say I would be happy if oprofile 0.9.4 could make it into > angstrom 2008.1. :) For which archs? It's already there for armv7a (it's part of the demo image): http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/repo/?action=details&pnm=oprofile regards, Koen