From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KnZqJ-0002M8-6L for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2008 16:16:47 +0200 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KnZlk-0005kT-Jj for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2008 14:12:04 +0000 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2008 14:12:04 +0000 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2008 14:12:04 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 16:11:52 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b1pre) Gecko/20080922030535 Shredder/3.0b1pre In-Reply-To: Sender: news Subject: Re: RFC: branch off the last stable branch under monotone? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 14:16:47 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 08-10-2008 15:46, Leon Woestenberg wrote: > Hello all, > > should we, or should we not, branch off a stable branch under > monotone, i.e. the last stable using monotone? > > The argument would be to offer the existing use base (which typically > lags behind much) a (last) monotone based branch. > > I can imagine the answer should be "no", as the number of maintainers > is low (and I am to blame as well). A read-only stable branch is pretty much useless, since you can't apply fixes to keep it stable. regards, Koen