From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KrahV-0002n1-5z for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:00:17 +0200 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KrahG-0004oJ-T7 for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 16:00:02 +0000 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 16:00:02 +0000 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 16:00:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 17:55:16 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20081017131704.GA4334@jama> <200810172041.10116.openembedded@haerwu.biz> <20081018183016.GA4310@jama> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b2pre) Gecko/20081015 Shredder/3.0b1pre In-Reply-To: Sender: news Subject: Re: checksums.ini - should check only against filename not uri_src X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 16:00:17 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 18-10-2008 21:49, Leon Woestenberg wrote: > Hello, > > On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:41:09PM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: >> could be used. From discussion on irc it seemed like global checksums.ini >> is not a good idea at all, at least because of high probability of merge >> conflicts, and that checksums should be moved to .bb files or defined on >> per-package files. >> > Yes, I agree the checksums solution should be redesigned. > > > Note that I have written a package to help import, learn and > automatically google for missing packages, from which some ideas might > be ripped. Could we use it in OE as do_fetch error handler? If we know the sha256 sum of a package it is safe to pull it from a semi-random place on the net when debian cleans out their archive again. regards, Koen > > Source here: > > http://www.sidebranch.com/leon/witpa_20080730.tar.bz2 > > Regards,