From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ks3OA-0001LC-Gj for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:38:14 +0200 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Ks3Nn-0000Kx-Rs for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:37:52 +0000 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:37:51 +0000 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:37:51 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:37:42 +0200 Message-ID: References: <48FCDCCD.4040704@dls.net> <1224536247.4235.282.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b2pre) Gecko/20081015 Shredder/3.0b1pre In-Reply-To: <1224536247.4235.282.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> Sender: news Subject: Re: git-native? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:38:14 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 20-10-2008 22:57, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 14:32 -0500, Mike (mwester) wrote: >> Er, just a thought... but now that we've switched to git, should OE just >> globally ASSUME_PROVIDED for git-native? > > I'm not sure what that would really buy you. It would be a pain for > downstream OE users who might be getting the metadata through some other > means (rather than checking it out directly from the OE git tree), and > it doesn't really seem like it would bring any great benefit. > Individual users can obviously set ASSUME_PROVIDED for git-native if > they want and I guess they should continue to do that. IIRC git-native was added for people without git (e.g. RHEL) or people only having old git versions (e.g. git 1.4) that the fetcher doesn't like. So removing it would have no positive effect other than shortening initial build time with a few seconds. regards, Koen