All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andre Puschmann <andre.puschmann@imms.de>
To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: flash read performance
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:14:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ge6old$oo3$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)

Hi list,

I am currently trying to improve the flash read performance of my 
platform. It's a gumstix verdex board with a pxa270 running at 400MHz. 
My flash is a 16MB NOR Intel StrataFlash P30 (128P30T) and it's 
operating in the _normal_ asynchronous mode. In my opinion the read 
performance is very poor, only around 1.2 to 1.4 MB/s depending on the 
blocksize. I think it should be possible to get much higher transfer rates.

In Linux, I ran my tests with dd like this (copy 10MB):
time dd if=/dev/mtd5 of=/dev/null bs=16k count=640
640+0 records in
640+0 records out
real    0m 7.17s
user    0m 0.00s
sys     0m 7.17s


Running top in another console brings up, that the CPU load is very high
during copy. I am not sure if the system is doing some sort of busy 
waiting or something like that? However, it should be possible to do a 
copy without having such a high load.

Mem: 17684K used, 45144K free, 0K shrd, 0K buff, 11164K cached
CPU:   0% usr 100% sys   0% nice   0% idle   0% io   0% irq   0% softirq
Load average: 0.10 0.17 0.09
  PID  PPID USER     STAT   VSZ %MEM %CPU COMMAND
  259   258 root     R     1100   2%  95% dd if /dev/mtd5 of /dev/null 
bs 16k co


I guess a number of people are using a similar/comparable setup. So some
kind of user benchmark would be nice.
I am sure this needs some more investigation, but any comment/hint is 
more than welcome.

Best regards,
Andre

             reply	other threads:[~2008-10-29  8:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-28 10:14 Andre Puschmann [this message]
2008-10-29 11:42 ` flash read performance Josh Boyer
2008-10-29 12:03   ` Jamie Lokier
2008-10-29 15:52   ` Andre Puschmann
2008-10-30  8:33     ` Arnaud Mouiche
2008-10-30  9:52       ` Andre Puschmann
2008-10-30 10:06         ` Arnaud Mouiche
2008-11-03 14:23           ` Andre Puschmann
2008-11-04  8:30             ` Andre Puschmann
2008-11-04 11:42             ` Jamie Lokier
2008-11-04 14:31               ` Andre Puschman
2008-11-07  2:41                 ` Trent Piepho
2008-11-07  4:02                   ` Jamie Lokier
2008-11-07  5:36                     ` Trent Piepho
2008-11-07  5:57                       ` Jamie Lokier
2008-11-07  9:47                   ` Andre Puschmann
2008-11-08  5:28                     ` Trent Piepho
2008-11-11 13:28                       ` Andre Puschmann
2008-11-15  2:02                         ` Trent Piepho

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='ge6old$oo3$1@ger.gmane.org' \
    --to=andre.puschmann@imms.de \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.