From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1L0CoQ-0008DX-6n for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:19:02 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1L0CmU-0007Bs-LY for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:17:02 +0000 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:17:02 +0000 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:17:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:16:49 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1226483313.7474.5.camel@aquilonia> <1226484007.17085.150.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b2pre) Gecko/20081106 Shredder/3.0b1pre In-Reply-To: <1226484007.17085.150.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> Sender: news Subject: Re: [RFC] Moving xorg.conf to seperate .bb file/package X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:19:07 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12-11-2008 11:00, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 09:48 +0000, Graeme Gregory wrote: >> At the moment xorg.conf is handled within the xserver-xorg .bb file. >> >> As xorg.conf varies per machine this will effectively make xserver-xorg >> machine specific which sort of defeats the purpose of a module xorg. >> >> My suggestion is to move xorg.conf out of xserver-xorg. Then add a >> RRECOMMEND_${PN} = "xserver-xorg-conf" to xserver-xorg. >> >> Is this a sane plan? > > Yes, that sounds like a splendid plan. I would even hope that some > (maybe most) machines can cope without having an xorg.conf at all > nowadays. With a machine using a plain framebuffer xorg.conf shouldn't be needed (or empty) anymore, for other machines like omap based ones an xorg.conf is needed to point to xf86-video-omapfb. So, yes, most machines in OE can do without an xorg.conf :) regards, Koen