From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1L3Z4T-0001Po-2x for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:41:29 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1L3Z1u-0007Ui-F4 for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:38:50 +0000 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:38:50 +0000 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:38:50 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:38:41 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4926D1D1.6030204@dresearch.de> <1227284043.6981.3.camel@aquilonia> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b2pre) Gecko/20081116 Shredder/3.0b1pre In-Reply-To: <1227284043.6981.3.camel@aquilonia> Sender: news Subject: Re: Revert "busybox: Disable busybox shadow support for Angstrom" X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:41:29 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 21-11-08 17:14, Graeme Gregory wrote: >>> 2. install /etc/shadow and fully support it (i believe ther is something more to do here) >> 2) is what is wanted for the angstrom 2008 release. >> >> regards, >> > > Yes it seems the devices we are using Angstrom on now are becoming more > like laptops every day. So we should be following security procedures > for big machines much more. > > I mean the latest set of omap3 devices are quite defineately eeePC > competitors. It's scary that something as big and fat like a standard ubuntu desktop is now a serious competitor in the omap3 space. But regardless of that, shadow passwords and PAM give better security that is transaparent for the user, so if for images >8MB we can support things like shadow passwds, PAM, encrypted homedirs, etc. regards, KOen