From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1L5JXk-0005b0-VM for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:30:57 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1L5JUr-0004rc-04 for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:27:57 +0000 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:27:56 +0000 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:27:56 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:27:48 +0100 Message-ID: References: <200811252242.05674.openembedded@haerwu.biz> <200811261011.09918.openembedded@haerwu.biz> <1227699097.15601.28.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b2pre) Gecko/20081120 Shredder/3.0b1pre In-Reply-To: <1227699097.15601.28.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> Sender: news Subject: Re: [RFC] LICENSE fields and packages X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:30:57 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 26-11-08 12:31, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 12:21 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: >>> ${PN}-license package on which all entries from PACKAGES will RDEPEND? >> Any objections to doing it this way till we have a proper bbclass? > > I think this is a fine idea. It should be a DISTRO opt-in choice, of > course, but I can't see any reason not to provide the facility. My idea was to make it opt-in on a per package basis since DISTROs can include base-files-doc for the most commit licenses (GPL, MIT, BSD, etc). regards, Koen