From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1L5LGa-00082T-Es for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:21:22 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1L5LDg-0000bp-Gs for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:18:20 +0000 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:18:20 +0000 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:18:20 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:18:10 +0100 Message-ID: References: <200811252242.05674.openembedded@haerwu.biz> <200811261011.09918.openembedded@haerwu.biz> <1227699097.15601.28.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> <1227707875.15601.41.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b2pre) Gecko/20081120 Shredder/3.0b1pre In-Reply-To: <1227707875.15601.41.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> Sender: news Subject: Re: [RFC] LICENSE fields and packages X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:21:24 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 26-11-08 14:57, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 13:27 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: >> On 26-11-08 12:31, Phil Blundell wrote: >>> On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 12:21 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: >>>>> ${PN}-license package on which all entries from PACKAGES will RDEPEND? >>>> Any objections to doing it this way till we have a proper bbclass? >>> I think this is a fine idea. It should be a DISTRO opt-in choice, of >>> course, but I can't see any reason not to provide the facility. >> My idea was to make it opt-in on a per package basis since DISTROs can >> include base-files-doc for the most commit licenses (GPL, MIT, BSD, etc). > > Hm, right. I guess the selection should be both per-package and > per-DISTRO. > > How about allowing the DISTRO to specify a regexp for the licences that > it "knows about"; any package for which ${LICENSE} doesn't match the > regexp will get the ${PN}-license thing. The default regexp would be > set to ".*" in bitbake.conf, in order to preserve the current behaviour > of not emitting any ${PN}-license; DISTROs that want to make use of the > new feature can set it to whatever they like. Sounds great. regards, Koen