From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1L5bS1-0000o5-MB for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 27 Nov 2008 08:38:13 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1L5bP0-0001XU-Sj for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 27 Nov 2008 07:35:06 +0000 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2008 07:35:06 +0000 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2008 07:35:06 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 08:34:54 +0100 Message-ID: References: <200811261755.53197.mickey@vanille-media.de> <1227721214.19934.33.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> <1227722637.19934.36.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> <1227726026.23391.245.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> <1227734853.23391.271.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b2pre) Gecko/20081120 Shredder/3.0b1pre In-Reply-To: <1227734853.23391.271.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> Sender: news Subject: Re: preferred-provider at the image level a.k.a why is all this fso stuff in my non-fso image X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 07:38:14 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 26-11-08 22:27, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 21:09 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: >> I'd rather have it only Conflict:, but that places extra burden on the >> fso people. > > I must admit to being a bit baffled as to the effect that you (and/or > the fso people) are trying to produce. Can you explain a bit more of > the background to this arrangement of packages? I'm trying to clean up the 'mess' caused by the fso-packages, you'd have to ask Mickey what he actually wanted to achieve with the conflicts/replaces/provides dance. regards, Koen