From: Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>
To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org
Subject: Re: invalidating udev cache, how?
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:11:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <gh930v$ks4$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49380C4F.1050809@dls.net>
On 04-12-08 17:58, Mike (mwester) wrote:
> Koen Kooi wrote:
> ...
>> My current ideas:
>>
>> 1) remove /etc/dev.tar if its> x weeks old
>> 2) recreate it on shutdown
>> 3) remove it after x times
>>
>> option 1) breaks on systems without an RTC and/or no /etc/timestamp
>> option 2) moves the slowness to shutdown
>> option 3) requires extra logic and filesystem access
>>
>> and all options don't fix the first case I mentioned, they all take a
>> while to make /dev/fb1 appear.
>>
>> The key is that it should be transparent to users, so adding a check for
>> .e.g 'ignore_dev.tar=1' in bootargs wouldn't work, since that implies
>> that users are aware of the problem and know how to 'fix' it.
>>
>> Does anyone have other ways to invalidate the cache, and if not, which
>> option would get your vote?
>
> A slight improvement would be to make the dev.tar file dependent upon
> the bootargs; i.e. invalidate /etc/dev.tar file if the boot command line
> doesn't match the current command line. This could be a very fast
> operation, just "cmp /proc/cmdline /etc/dev_cmdline" or similar.
That solves only part of the problem, since on omap3 we enable a
different fb driver that doesn't require any bootargs (and safely
ignores the ones for the old driver) and gives you an additional overlay
(/dev/fb2).
But I think combining the 'cmp /proc/cmdline /etc/dev_cmdline' with
option 2) would solve most of the problems I'm seeing in a not-too-ugly
way :)
Thanks for the suggestion!
regards,
Koen
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-04 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-04 16:05 invalidating udev cache, how? Koen Kooi
2008-12-04 16:15 ` Tom Rini
2008-12-04 17:35 ` Koen Kooi
2008-12-04 18:49 ` Tom Rini
2008-12-04 19:02 ` Koen Kooi
2008-12-04 19:17 ` Tom Rini
2008-12-04 16:35 ` Thomas Kunze
2008-12-04 17:03 ` Koen Kooi
2008-12-04 16:58 ` Mike (mwester)
2008-12-04 17:09 ` Mike (mwester)
2008-12-04 17:41 ` Koen Kooi
2008-12-04 18:50 ` Tom Rini
2009-03-03 5:11 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2009-03-03 7:24 ` Koen Kooi
2009-03-03 15:16 ` Tom Rini
2008-12-04 17:11 ` Koen Kooi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='gh930v$ks4$1@ger.gmane.org' \
--to=k.kooi@student.utwente.nl \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=openembedded-devel@openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.