From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1L8Jym-0004PI-1S for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:35:16 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1L8JvE-00021U-Q0 for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:31:36 +0000 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:31:36 +0000 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:31:36 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:31:27 +0100 Message-ID: References: <49382D2D.1030504@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20081130 Shredder/3.0b1pre In-Reply-To: <49382D2D.1030504@gmx.net> Sender: news Subject: Re: RFC: remove boost-jam-native 3.1.11 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:35:16 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 04-12-08 20:19, Robert Schuster wrote: > Hi, > I would like to remove the boost-jam-native recipe for version 3.1.11 > and instead rely on version 3.1.16 which we also have. Can't we but those recipes (and associated patches) in obsolete/boost/? That way it will be outside of the default BBPATH and within reach for people needing/wanting it. I'm not a big fan deletionist behaviour since we can't tell if people are relying on it since not everyone keeps their stuff in OE[1]. Also: what happened to removal.txt? regards, Koen [1] OTOH, keeping their stuff out of OE is their own choice, with the associated troubles, much like external kernel modules and mainline