From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1L91rp-00028r-RR for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Sat, 06 Dec 2008 19:27:01 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1L91oB-0002AJ-Mt for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Sat, 06 Dec 2008 18:23:15 +0000 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 06 Dec 2008 18:23:15 +0000 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 06 Dec 2008 18:23:15 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2008 19:23:07 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1228574376.5375.6.camel@dax.rpnet.com> <20081206175006.GI16628@smtp.west.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20081130 Shredder/3.0b1pre In-Reply-To: <20081206175006.GI16628@smtp.west.cox.net> Sender: news Cc: bitbake-dev@lists.berlios.de Subject: Re: Bitbake release X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2008 18:27:02 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 06-12-08 18:50, Tom Rini wrote: > On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 04:32:52PM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: >> On 06-12-08 15:39, Richard Purdie wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> As people have probably noticed I just synced up a number of useful >>> changes from Poky into bitbake and brought things pretty much back into >>> sync. >>> >>> The current plan is to let this stabilise for 1 week and the providing >>> no major bugs were introduced, make a new release (finally!). >> Not a bug, but something for people to note: >> >> http://projects.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2008-October/006289.html > > > As I asked at the time, what's this doing? Do all distros need to do > this? What's Angstrom doing on the metadata side to make use of this? > Thanks! The angstrom buildscripts (http://cgit.openembedded.net/cgit.cgi?url=openembedded/tree/contrib/angstrom) pass MACHINE and ANGSTROM_MODE via the shell enviroment to avoid spurious reparsing. Since bitbake clean the environment the vars don't get into bitbake. regards, Koen