From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1L9S2h-0008G4-Vn for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2008 23:24:00 +0100 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1L9Ryt-0004cL-F4 for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2008 22:20:03 +0000 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 07 Dec 2008 22:20:03 +0000 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 07 Dec 2008 22:20:03 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 23:16:37 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1223383906-4111-1-git-send-email-eha@doredevelopment.dk> <20081202174141.GB16628@smtp.west.cox.net> <1228250322.5456.70.camel@dax.rpnet.com> <20081202212155.GG16628@smtp.west.cox.net> <20081206214525.GJ16628@smtp.west.cox.net> <20081207193340.GC15204@smtp.west.cox.net> <20081207201118.GD15204@smtp.west.cox.net> <19c1b8a90812071340o57e4542cv8452e324445c64e@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20081130 Shredder/3.0b1pre In-Reply-To: <19c1b8a90812071340o57e4542cv8452e324445c64e@mail.gmail.com> Sender: news Subject: Re: Canadian SDK support X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 22:24:00 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07-12-08 22:40, Khem Raj wrote: > On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: >> On 07-12-08 21:11, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 09:00:47PM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: >>>> On 07-12-08 20:33, Tom Rini wrote: >>>> >>>>> As an aside, gcc-cross-sdk on arm(v6 only?) is blowing up in fortran, >>>>> but I've got a git bisect narrowing that down now (30 revs left). >>>> gcc-cross-sdk picks the wrong patch (from files/gfortran.patch) instead >>>> of the correct one from gcc-4.2.4/gfortran.patch. gcc-cross *does* pick >>>> the right patch. >>> For gcc-4.2.4.inc would it be OK to rename gfortran.patch to >>> gfortran-4.2.4.patch and fix this problem? >> If 4.2.4 is the only using it (which I doubt), that would be the way to go. >> IIRC all gcc 4.2 variants (so also the dreaded csl 2007qX ones) need the one >> with '64', the 4.3.x ones (including csl 2008qX) need the one with '65'. > > Why do we need these two. 65 one sounds worng to me from first look. It is wrong in a way that it check for a 128bit cpu, but I can confirm that running compiled fortran programs works very well with it. Using the 'correct' version with '64' would cause a regression, which is not what we want. regards, Koen regards, Koen