From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LAgN6-0006mG-1z for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 08:54:09 +0100 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LAgJ9-0001Wz-11 for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 07:50:03 +0000 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 07:50:03 +0000 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 07:50:03 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 08:48:56 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20081210234910.GA16050@excalibur.local> <200812110137.01104.mickey@vanille-media.de> <4940650B.1000802@dls.net> <200812110207.39687.mickey@vanille-media.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20081205 Shredder/3.0b2pre In-Reply-To: <200812110207.39687.mickey@vanille-media.de> Sender: news Subject: Re: [RFC] Ship dbus config and dbus service activation files X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 07:54:10 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11-12-08 02:07, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > Am Thursday 11 December 2008 01:55:39 schrieb Mike (mwester): >> Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: >>> We can compile it completely without dbus support in a seperate recipe, >>> if that's what you want -- but given the increasing ubiquity of dbus, >>> that doesn't make much sense. >> Which raises a point -- there are still devices out there that don't >> want the X11 libraries (due to flash space limitations) -- perhaps it is >> _dbus_ that needs splitting into two separate recipes, one with X and >> one without? > > I'd rather write a patch that tries to dlopen libX11. dbus needs libX11 only > for setting one property on the root window. Well, as I said in another mail, dbus-1 and libdbus-1-3 don't require x11 *at all*, so no patch needs to be written. For people wanting the x11 integration they can install the 'dbus-x11' subpackage. Just like python-tk :) regards, Koen