From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LQH08-00069L-Hu for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 09:02:52 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LQGt8-0004m5-Ji for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 07:55:38 +0000 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 07:55:38 +0000 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 07:55:38 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 08:55:22 +0100 Message-ID: References: <200901230131.09511.mickey@vanille-media.de> <87wscmn8ne.fsf@neumann.lab.ossystems.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090114 Shredder/3.0b2pre In-Reply-To: <87wscmn8ne.fsf@neumann.lab.ossystems.com.br> Sender: news Subject: Re: Bugtracker Status X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 08:02:52 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 23-01-09 01:55, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > I propose to change the workflow a bit (and reuse few points you've proposed): > > 1. stop using bugtracker to handle patches > 2. use mailing list to handle patches (comments bellow) > 3. drop autobuilder bug reporting (comments bellow) I agree on all points, I have been advocating 2) for a long time :) regards, Koen > Besides, I have no objection about your points 2.2 and 2.3 but I'm too > new in the OE environment to comment about them so let me comment > about my points: > > 1 and 2: > > We're trying to get more people to review the changes to be done in > OE dev tree and bugzilla UI is horrible and difficult to use (at > least for me). Most people ends up redoing someone else patch since > we don't watch carefully the bugtrack. > > I propose we move to mailing list reviewing process mostly like Linux > kernel does. We can use PatchWork (http://ozlabs.org/~jk/projects/patchwork/) > tool to make our life easier. I see some pros for that: > > . people will get more review into the patches > . people will be aware of ongoing work and what is being prepared to > be merged > . less forgotten patches > . less duplicated work > > I also see a single con for that: > > . more mailing list traffic > > 3: > > Instead of reporting bugs, we could mail mailing list with the > failure and link a log for someone to take a look. It makes us to > worry more about the change since if we break something _everyone_ > we'll know it :-) > > My 2c :P >