From: Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>
To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [beagleboard] Re: Beagle actions for Rev C validation software image
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:48:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <glnvfu$1l9$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090127210257.GA31920@denix.org>
On 27-01-09 22:02, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:19:36PM -0600, Jason Kridner wrote:
>> Adding oe-dev mailing list...
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Dmytriyenko, Denys<denys@ti.com> wrote:
>>>>> It's a bit sad that we're going to miss out on NEON and vo_omapfb by
>>>>> going armv5te :(
>>>> Koen,
>>>> I am rebuilding 'mplayer' now with 'MACHINE=beagleboard bitbake mplayer',
>>>> so that concern should go away. It shouldn't matter much about this
>>>> mplayer, since it should only be used to test the hardware.
>>>> Can you consider inclusion of:
>>>> mplayer and FFmpeg dependency changes:
>>>> http://www.beagleboard.org/gitweb/?p=arago-oe.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=0b53219005c8daa95bcff40742d7c807bda17eca
>>> Hmm, I like these curl-inspired *_FEATURES handlers. The only problem with
>>> those is they won't trigger automatic rebuild when the featureset in the
>>> variable changes - don't forget to run bitbake -c rebuild manually...
>> Can I get a few comments on [1]? I found there is also a dependency
>> in libtheora on x11 that doesn't seem necessary. I find this very
>> useful to avoid making a new recipe. Anyone have ideas to address
>> Denys' concern about needing to issue 'bitbake -c rebuild'?
>>
>> [1] http://www.beagleboard.org/gitweb/?p=arago-oe.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=0b53219005c8daa95bcff40742d7c807bda17eca
>
> For some reason Koen's reply never made it to the oe-dev list... Sorry for
> copying it here to continue the discussion.
>
> Koen said:
>> I'm against adding such 'USE flags' to OE, they basically make QA impossible.
>> If people want a different mplayer, they are free to make an 'mplayer-nox' or
>> 'mplayer-nosdl' recipe to fill their needs.
>
> But on the other hand it would make overlays, such as Arago, as well as OE
> itself, much cleaner and reduce the recipe creep.
>
> As of the rebuild issue when featureset in the variable changes, I was
> thinking about storing a hash of variable's value, in addition to the
> standard version and revision numbers, should trigger an automatic rebuild.
> Similar to bumping up a PR, but without modifying the recipe. Any thoughts?
I'm concerned with mplayer_1.0_armv7a.ipk not being the same as
mplayer_1.0_armv7a.ipk, which is what USE flags do.
regards,
Koen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-27 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <5899DAF1-278D-43D5-8C90-BECD7FC3E4B5@beagleboard.org>
[not found] ` <f20732e90901270708t65dc4a67jfe0829bb6ca4c540@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <B1B8AC48-51AB-435E-A431-AC1494B171DA@beagleboard.org>
[not found] ` <670B7A54-3C74-42FD-A6F8-DAAFD4AEC73A@beagleboard.org>
[not found] ` <A69FA2915331DC488A831521EAE36FE4012470D042@dlee06.ent.ti.com>
2009-01-27 18:19 ` [beagleboard] Re: Beagle actions for Rev C validation software image Jason Kridner
2009-01-27 21:02 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2009-01-27 21:48 ` Koen Kooi [this message]
2009-01-27 21:54 ` Jason Kridner
[not found] ` <E9998B7D-F3BE-484A-BDAE-75B25BEEC330@beagleboard.org>
2009-01-27 22:25 ` Jason Kridner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='glnvfu$1l9$1@ger.gmane.org' \
--to=k.kooi@student.utwente.nl \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=openembedded-devel@openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.