From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LX2Nc-0006CL-Ae for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:51:04 +0100 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LX2Mc-0004md-L1 for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:50:02 +0000 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:50:02 +0000 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:50:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:45:03 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1234305968.16455.3.camel@alap> <200902102359.05196.mickey@vanille-media.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090131 Shredder/3.0b2pre In-Reply-To: <200902102359.05196.mickey@vanille-media.de> Sender: news Subject: Re: [patch] bump qi rev on milestone5 branch X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:51:04 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10-02-09 23:59, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > Applied. > > What's the status of that patchwork installation, now that people flood this > list with patches? Only the config files need to get filled in and the patchwork user needs to receive the mails, that's it. As is said in my mail to oe-priv, feel free to jump in. And I wouldn't call the current amount of patches/week a flood :) regards, Koen