From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LXb40-0006Eh-70 for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:53:08 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LXb2i-0007pn-Fl for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:51:48 +0000 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:51:48 +0000 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:51:48 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:51:34 +0100 Message-ID: References: <200902121426.26727.roman@khimov.ru> <200902121541.09495.roman@khimov.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090209 Shredder/3.0b2pre In-Reply-To: <200902121541.09495.roman@khimov.ru> Sender: news Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix rpm2cio sums X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:53:08 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12-02-09 13:41, Roman I Khimov wrote: > Koen Kooi: >> On 12-02-09 12:26, Roman I Khimov wrote: >>> Don't know why, but rpm2cpio tarball checksums are wrong, so here is >>> the fix: >> If they are wrong we want to see the diff between the old and new >> tarballs, replacing checksums as soon as upstream changes defeats the >> purpose of us adding them. > > If I've had old one anywhere around, I'd show the diff, but the problem is I > don't have it. > > From what I see most probably it's some meta-data changes as we have > ready-to-install FreeBSD tarball there with all > its "+COMMENT", "+CONTENTS", "+DESC", "+MTREE_DIRS" files. So > the 'rpm2cpio.pl' itself should be the same. > > Now another question is why OE package uses such tarball as source at all. > So, probably we can change the source to something like > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/%7Echeckout%7E/ports/archivers/rpm2cpio/files/rpm2cpio?rev=1.2;content-type=text%2Fplain;only_with_tag=RELEASE_7_1_0 > > which is the only file we need and it's rev'd tagged should-be-non-volatile. Seeing the current sitation with the freebsd people this would get my vote. regards, Koen