From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LZTb4-0004bO-PZ for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:19:05 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LZTZ8-00053E-Lk for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:17:02 +0000 Received: from p031211.dynamic.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp ([221.113.31.211]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:17:02 +0000 Received: from no2spam by p031211.dynamic.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:17:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Rolf Leggewie Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 02:16:51 +0900 Message-ID: References: <499AD8D6.3000708@balister.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p031211.dynamic.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) In-Reply-To: <499AD8D6.3000708@balister.org> Sender: news Subject: Re: Autobuilder bugs versus stable branch being updated X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:19:19 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Philip, thank you for your comment. Philip Balister wrote: > I think it is a but of stretch to close old autobuilder bugs with the > comment the stable branch will not be updated. That should not be the case (unless of course they were both of type .stable and -autobuild). > These two issues are unrelated. Agreed. All closed bugs should have received a comment with an URL for further information as to why they were closed. If you think there is a problem, please let me know a sample bug number and I'll see if there was anything that went wrong (which can of course happen when mass-handling bugs). If there was an error, I'll gladly fix that. If you think the closure message was too short, I can add a more verbose comment to all or a collection of the closed bugs. Regards Rolf