From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Lcx5A-0001Ir-It for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:24:28 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Lcx1p-0002Po-FS for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:21:01 +0000 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:21:01 +0000 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:21:01 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:20:51 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20090226154007.GZ2172@smtp.west.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090219 Shredder/3.0b3pre In-Reply-To: <20090226154007.GZ2172@smtp.west.cox.net> Sender: news Subject: Re: [RFC] update opkg* SRCREV to 201 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:24:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 26-02-09 16:40, Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 03:55:32PM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: >> On 25-02-09 21:46, Koen Kooi wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I was getting seriously annoyed with the useless error codes opkg was >>> giving me and Tick pointed me to: >>> >>> http://code.google.com/p/opkg/issues/detail?id=6&can=1 >>> >>> We're at 197 now in OE (with r201 applied as patch). I'd like to get >>> r199 and r200 in as well, and since I'm lazy I though we'd get r198 in >>> as well, which means instead of adding a few patches I can just bump up >>> SRCREV to 201. >>> >>> What do you think? >> Noone is thinking anything? > > not since I switched to debs You still going to get bitten by opkg bugs when using packaged-staging