From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Leoe2-0002df-AW for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 11:48:11 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Leo6k-0007hL-9s for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:13:46 +0000 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:13:46 +0000 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:13:46 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 11:13:30 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20090303204954.CCB9CE8008@amethyst.openembedded.net> <1236119119.10602.62.camel@andromeda> <49ADB183.5070709@balister.org> <1236120999.10602.70.camel@andromeda> <49AE5117.5020806@gefanuc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090225 Shredder/3.0b3pre In-Reply-To: <49AE5117.5020806@gefanuc.com> Sender: news Subject: Re: [oe-commits] Koen Kooi : angstrom 2009.X: bump automake-native to 1.10. 2 since some idiot deleted 1.10 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:48:18 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 04-03-09 10:59, Martyn Welch wrote: > Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: >> Am Dienstag, den 03.03.2009, 17:38 -0500 schrieb Philip Balister: >>> Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: >>>> Am Dienstag, den 03.03.2009, 21:49 +0100 schrieb GIT User account: >>>>> Module: openembedded.git >>>>> Branch: org.openembedded.dev >>>>> Commit: eee859a9c348871d6d644ece76bc57b151cc80e8 >>>>> URL: >>>>> http://gitweb.openembedded.net/?p=openembedded.git&a=commit;h=eee859a9c348871d6d644ece76bc57b151cc80e8 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Author: Koen Kooi >>>>> Date: Tue Mar 3 21:47:57 2009 +0100 >>>>> >>>>> angstrom 2009.X: bump automake-native to 1.10.2 since some idiot >>>>> deleted 1.10 >>>> Ah, are we in that mood again? Take more pills. >>> We need to have a serious discussion about deleting recipes. I know >>> the deletion of python 2.5 will force me to address the 2.5->2.6 >>> upgrade in gnuradio before the upstream developers are ready. >>> >>> We need a way to remove recipes, but doing it as part of adding a new >>> recipe is causing problems for OE users. >> >> Yes, we need to have a serious discussion about lots of things >> surrounding the OpenEmbedded project, before the popularity kills the >> project. Judging from the amount of interest though, I don't see that >> happening -- neither short term nor long term. >> > > Ok, so if a serious discussion is out of the question, lets just have a > normal discussion. > > I see this issue to be partially related to the on going discussions > regarding submissions. I assume that the "Commit_Policy"[1] on the wiki > is either unofficial, out-of-date or optional as it states: > > * Changes to core toolchain components need review (gcc, binutils, > libtool, pkgconfig, automake, autoconf etc.) > > Where: > > "Review" is defined as posting it on the mailing lists and getting > positive agreement from two or more core developers. > Now a quick check of my OpenEmbedded mail folder doesn't chuck up any > messages with automake in the title that have a patch with this commit. > Maybe I'm looking on the wrong mailing list. I haven't seen anything like that either, and upgrading automake *did* break, since a lot of apps now do 'install -s' which calls host strip :( This is exactly why we did extensive testing the last time we touched automake. regards, Koen